CORPORATE REALIGNMENT: FORMER DRAGON AGE EXEC SPECULATES BIOWARE SALE AS NEW EA OWNERS FOCUS ON ‘PR-FRIENDLY’ ASSETS
Popular Now










The gaming industry is reeling from the massive $55 billion leveraged buyout of Electronic Arts (EA) by a consortium that includes Saudi Arabia’s Public Investment Fund (PIF) and Jared Kushner’s Affinity Partners. Amid widespread speculation about the future of EA’s studios, former BioWare veteran and executive producer on the Dragon Age series, Mark Darrah, has voiced sharp concerns, suggesting the storied role-playing game studio may be vulnerable to a sale due to its famously progressive messaging and the new ownership’s likely preference for less controversial, more financially direct properties like EA Sports.
The Saudi-Backed Buyout and BioWare’s Political Climate
The acquisition, which takes EA private and saddles the publisher with a staggering $20 billion in debt, is projected to close in early 2027. This financial structure—a leveraged buyout (LBO)—places immense pressure on the new ownership to implement aggressive cost-cutting measures and maximize short-term revenue. Darrah, a respected figure in the industry, has highlighted how this new financial imperative, coupled with the political interests of the key investors, may clash directly with the cultural output of studios like BioWare, known for diverse and often politically charged narratives in franchises like Mass Effect and Dragon Age.
- The Debt Factor: The $20 billion in debt financing necessitates a sharp focus on highly profitable, low-risk ventures. This financial reality could easily categorize BioWare—which has struggled with recent releases like Anthem and the mixed reception of Dragon Age: The Veilguard—as a divestment candidate.
- The Ideological Conflict: Darrah explicitly questioned the compatibility of BioWare’s “very progressive messaging” with the interests of a state-backed fund like the PIF. He noted that attempting to force a pivot to the “reverse” messaging would likely result in an “apocalyptically bad” public reaction, making the studio’s cultural footprint a liability rather than an asset.
- PR and ‘Sportswashing’: The PIF’s investment strategy across global entertainment—often termed “sportswashing” to improve the country’s international image—has historically focused on non-controversial, mass-appeal assets. Darrah’s commentary suggests that the new owners may opt to use less politically risky studios, such as those under the EA Sports umbrella, for their public relations (PR) efforts, viewing them as a safer, more palatable vehicle for brand alignment than the narrative-driven, often politically complex worlds created by BioWare.
The former exec also pointed out the potential for the new owners to quietly “put their thumb on the scale” of studios with a less-established track record to steer their messaging in a more favorable, PR-friendly direction. However, he believes the established identity of BioWare makes this kind of internal cultural shift a far more dangerous proposition.
Layoffs, Studio Sales, and the Future of Dormant IPs
Darrah’s analysis paints a grim short-to-medium-term picture for EA’s studios, predicting a wave of layoffs and potential studio closures as the company scrambles to service its new financial obligations. He speculates on several possible scenarios for the non-sports and non-military simulation segments of the business, collectively referred to as EA Entertainment:
- Studio Divestment: Selling off the entire EA Entertainment division to a competitor, such as a large console manufacturer with “deep pockets,” thereby offloading studios that do not fit the new owners’ long-term vision.
- IP Monetization: The potential sale of EA’s “huge repository of dormant IPs” to quickly generate revenue that can be used to chip away at the $20 billion debt. While he doesn’t suggest Dragon Age or Mass Effect are immediate candidates, the strategy of selling lesser-used franchises for millions could set a new precedent for cost-cutting.
- The Survival of EA Sports: Darrah believes EA Sports, a consistent, multi-billion dollar cash cow with globally appealing franchises like Madden NFL and the newly rebranded EA Sports FC, is the core asset the PIF and its partners will retain and focus on, given the PIF’s existing portfolio of sports-related investments.
Anonymous reports from current BioWare staff corroborate the atmosphere of uncertainty, with some developers allegedly preparing their portfolios for potential job searching. The poor commercial performance of Dragon Age: The Veilguard, which was reportedly deemed a “disappointment” by EA leadership earlier this year, has further compounded the fear that BioWare is now a prime target for a corporate restructure or sale.
While EA’s current CEO, Andrew Wilson, has stated that the company’s “values will remain unchanged” under the new ownership, the sheer magnitude of the LBO debt and the cultural alignment of the primary investors suggest a powerful shift in corporate priorities is inevitable. For a studio like BioWare, which thrives on narrative depth and progressive themes, the era of private equity and state-backed ownership signals a period of unprecedented risk and instability, making the prospect of a studio sale a highly plausible outcome to balance the books and streamline the portfolio for Saudi Arabian PR interests.